-
Website
http://leoville.com/ -
Original page
http://leoville.com/2008/04/09/1440/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
mndoci
6 comments · 2 points
-
leolaporte
90 comments · 32 points
-
kingkool68
8 comments · 4 points
-
reechard
6 comments · 6 points
-
jerichobp
6 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
Great pictures btw, good work and keep them coming :-)
Memnon.
(Thessaloniki,Greece)
Does your camcorder have a remote zoom cause I think you needed to pull back a bit as you framed out your head.
Great vid though mate.
Cheers
Hope you can get 3-4 weeks off and have a good (via road!) look around one day!
Kinda like getting carried around in yer pack :-}
Have a safe boat trip.
Looking forward to the pics.
Love the posts - keep'em comin'.
I miss you in Tassie by one week I am a photographer working on a book on Organics in Australia and will be in Tassie from the 15th , love your blog . Nice to see Tasmania getting some attention it truly is a wonderful place , very beautiful, eat lots of those great oysters they produce down there
keep up the good work
cheers
Simon
Cheers
that's going on my wish list. Looks like your having to much fun out there. just be care full. but,we all miss you down in the states. :)
I used to have a Slingshot, couldn't stand it. It was too hard to change lenses and get at other equipment.
A correction: Canon only makes one 50mm L lens, the one you have.
As for macro lenses, I'd take the 100mm macro any day over the 180. It's cheaper smaller and is super sharp. I think you're giving L lenses too much credit. Sure it has a smaller working distance but the 180mm is best used on a tripod anyway, so if you're not using a tripod I'd leave the 180 at home.
As for the D3, it is highly overrated. The reason their high ISO images are so noise free is that the camera does major noise reduction where Canon cameras don't or don't unless you turn it on. You can get the same effect with a noise reduction solution in post. Plus Nikon's high ISO images have a smooth plasticy look that is unappealing (it's a result of noise reduciton). As reviews have said any ISO over 6400 on the D3 is just a marketing point. The images that high are not very usable in most situations. Be happy with your 5D, I'd take it over a D3 any day.
One more thing, why did you shoot video into the sun? You, your bag and all the stuff in it were in shadow.
Now, get back to making podcasts. :)
Pffftt - just a mascot! hehe Your photos are great, I've enjoyed following your reports of the trip, and your experiences in Australia. Great place, I've traveled there twice for extended stays, though missed Tasmania altogether.
I'm curious whether you missed not having a telephoto lens in your kit, and if so, what you are deciding on.
I have not yet gone the full DSLR route, having recently had my entire camera bag of SLR Nikon gear stolen. But, now is the time, as I am preparing for a 2-week kayak trip in Alaska and want some good camera gear. Canon body and lenses for sure, though I am eagerly awaiting the successor to the 5D (I've tried to get on The Tech Guy to torture out of you what you might have heard in this regard!). "L" series lenses as well, though the 100mm macro has caught my eye. Others will be the 24-105mm L IS (sure wish they made this at better than f/4), 100-400mm L IS, possibly the 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS and 16-35mm f/2.8 L . Gitzo tripod/Malkin ballhead to keep it all from falling to the dirt.
Most of my outings will be in the mountains or by rivers, so I really like the slingshot pack, hopefully they make one slightly larger.
So, how about it - what did you hear from the pros on the successor to your 5D. Eager wallets want to know. :-)
Anyhoo, thanks for sharing your adventures.