<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Léoville - Latest Comments in This Old Post</title><link>http://leolaporte.disqus.com/</link><description>The personal blog of technology pundit Leo Laporte</description><atom:link href="https://leolaporte.disqus.com/this_old_post/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 02:32:17 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: This Old Post</title><link>http://leoville.com/2008/04/18/1475/#comment-2620208</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's easily the second-best TechTV adios I've ever read. It may have been more prescient, but it lacks a catchy tagline, like, oh, say, "eagle semen".&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">*Legion*</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 02:32:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This Old Post</title><link>http://leoville.com/2008/04/18/1475/#comment-2620207</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I had to blow the dust off an old VHS and find a VCR to play it but it was a tape of the time I got to ask a question of you and Patrick via the telephone and web cam (on dialup no less).  I appeared on the show wearing a NASA hat and wanted to tell you that the current astronaut that was going up in the shuttle at the time actually live 10 miles from my house but I froze. The producer?? said not to dwell and ask my question directly.  Boy oh boy I enjoyed screen savers.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Randall L Emert Sr</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 22:03:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This Old Post</title><link>http://leoville.com/2008/04/18/1475/#comment-2620206</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Lol, I had a timex computer when I was a kid that used the audio cassettes. Wanna know how long ago this was? I used it on a little black and white tv!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Spencer</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 13:41:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This Old Post</title><link>http://leoville.com/2008/04/18/1475/#comment-2620205</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Leo Laporte's Technology Almanac and Poor Leo's Computer&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Call-For-Help-a-Thon&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;the good old days&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; ZdTVTech-tv&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;RIP&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; May 11, 1998 -September 7, 2004.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;September 7,2004 the day G4tv4 had decided to revamp The Screen Savers by making it more pop culture, Internet, and gaming-oriented.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">darkwing duck</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 12:23:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This Old Post</title><link>http://leoville.com/2008/04/18/1475/#comment-2620203</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I remember the early years, TSS and Call for Help were great.  Leo is a great tv personality.  During the declining years I quit watching and just realized about a year ago that it was gone from my cable line up.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;BTW, God bless the person that mentioned the Commodore VIC-20!  It was my first computer but when I tell people about it they always say that they never heard of it and think I'm talking about the Commodore 64.   Remember the tape drives that used audio cassette tapes?  Those were the days!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 22:30:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This Old Post</title><link>http://leoville.com/2008/04/18/1475/#comment-2620204</link><description>&lt;p&gt;God, I remember the good old days in 98-99 watching TSS and CFH. TechTV was an awesome channel back then. I learned a lot of stuff from that channel. Good times, good times.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; I was sad when G4 merged into it and gutted the shows and personalities. Now, G4 is nothing more than a cheap version of SpikeTV targeting pothead gamers, Between the forced "sex sells" bits and the ADD dysfunctional segments, I keep wondering when the channel will drop completely from the airwaves.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;However, I think it's all working out for the best. Most of the people who worked at TechTV have moved onto better things. Some of those who now do IPtv are exactly where TechTV's evolution would have taken them anyways. As tech savvy people shift from watching TV to using PCs and Mobile devices for their entertainment. IPtv is where TechTV's true demographic is.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If you look hard enough there's a lot of what TechTV was on the web. They maybe low budget versions of the old shows; but without the producers to much everything up, It's allowing the personalities and content to shine.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;P.S. I'm looking forward to your new homemade Tech show, Leo. I hope it goes well and you have fun with it. I'm sure i'll be checking it out.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cirris</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 11:12:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This Old Post</title><link>http://leoville.com/2008/04/18/1475/#comment-2620202</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Coincidentally, I, too am in various ways incompetent, arrogant, strategically moronic and completely inept. It's TechTV all over again!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dane Golden</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 21:00:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This Old Post</title><link>http://leoville.com/2008/04/18/1475/#comment-2620201</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for reposting this Leo. I was a TechTV fan back then (I was part of the demographic that should have been targeted - the one that only Screen Savers kept on board). I was seriously bummed when the company sold.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;However, I'm glad that most of this happened because you guys are putting out incredible content now. So thanks for doing what you do. The programming everyone is putting out on the web is still great. So thanks for proving them wrong.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joelgoodman</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 09:27:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This Old Post</title><link>http://leoville.com/2008/04/18/1475/#comment-2620200</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh yeah, I forgot to mention the attack of the show episode I caught the other night where the hosts were dry humping giant balloons. What in the heck is this G4 thing, what exactly is the point and what exactly is it supposed to be now?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I haven't had a chance yet but will be checking out twitter. Maybe I can get back to the good stuff there.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Spencer</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 05:45:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This Old Post</title><link>http://leoville.com/2008/04/18/1475/#comment-2620199</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I work in digital media and in my time have come across a number of "TV-types", they are certainly in a class of their own (well it might also include advertising execs) and I still struggle to understand their motivations.&lt;br&gt;So what motivates Leo? I'm not suggesting he is in anyway like that [scum-of-the-earth]. How can someone as genuine as he(him?) have survived to this point?&lt;br&gt;I believe Leo understands the new way and I say good luck, but hurry up though - I can't keep crossing my legs for too much longer!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Martin</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 05:00:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This Old Post</title><link>http://leoville.com/2008/04/18/1475/#comment-2620198</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, I for one miss techtv and have often wondered what all of the old techtv people were up to now. I knew that Kevin went on to start digg but wondered if he was still with Sara. What Patrick was doing now, and of course what Leo was up to. I finally did a search for Leo and found this site tonight as I turned to G4 and saw an all day weed smoking marathon :(&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have to admit that it makes me sad as I sit here and watch weed smoking programing on the G4. Sure I like Ninja Warrior and Unbeatable Banzuke but come on, not tech related and there's not really much to learn from Japanese people running through obsticals.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Techtv taught me so much back in the day and inspired me to start building websites. Now I make a decent living from my websites and much of it is due to Leo, Kevin, Patrick and the rest of the techtv crew. Heck, I learned more from Leo and Kevin on techtv than I ever learned in my college computer classes lol.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Now that I think about it I think I'm going to add a tech room to my new chat and community site and dedicate it to the old techtv. Hey Leo, how about setting up a live chat with all of your old fans sometime? Heck, just get on your webcam and fire up your mic and you can do a help line episode live for old times sake lol.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Anyway, glad to see you're doing well post techtv Leo and thank you for all that you've done for me while techtv was alive.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Spencer</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 04:42:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This Old Post</title><link>http://leoville.com/2008/04/18/1475/#comment-2620197</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Way before comment fields in blogs there was local office email.  Most of the Techs for my previous company knew the password for an email account of a long gone employee.  Whenever we had a serious grievance with management one of us would cc the entire company with this account.  Management loved this, as they could never identify the "troublemaker" sending honest truth their way.  Good times.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For my part, Tech TV only barely piqued my interest.  I derived some pleasure at disagreeing with their hosts and scoffing at the subjects they seemed to barely understand.  Now I miss that slight sense of irritation.  The Tech has been replaced with a "G" - or rather  a "Dirty Mack"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I recently found some Revision3 feeds via XBMC and am looking foreword to giving it another chance.  My take on the naming is: TechTV -&amp;gt; G4 -&amp;gt; Revision3.  Third try is a charm!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">slobu</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 19:27:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This Old Post</title><link>http://leoville.com/2008/04/18/1475/#comment-2620196</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Personally, i think the real reason for the collapse of TechTV was because Comcast just wanted to buy them and kill the only network they were competing with. We all know G4 and TechTV didn't have a lot in common, but they did both do video game coverage, and frankly, TechTV's was better, even though G4 was targeted completely to a video gaming audience. Frankly, i think Comcast used their control over what their network owned to slowly drop TechTV from homes, in order to lower its value, just so they could buy it out and steal the one show they wanted, Gamespot TV, or whatever the heck they are calling it now.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But to be honest, my opinion is that TechTV was terrible. It was great in the beginning, ZDTV was where it was at. (I still have some ZDTV coffee mugs) Around the same time the name change was going on, i was loosing interest, because they were shuffling things around too much. They canceled Internet Tonight, Moved Leo off of Call for Help, and added about a dozen people i didn't care about at all to The Screen Savers. I practically stopped watching TechTV completely at that point, but when Leo returned to Call for Help later, i did start watching again - and grudgingly accepted all the new talent on The Screen Savers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To this day, i can't stand Kevin Rose - because his addition to The Screen Savers to me coincided with the death of the network as i knew it. I know its an odd reason to hate someone, but all of my anger towards the higher ups at TechTV and Comcast gets directed to him whenever i see him.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But as others said, at least it all led to what we have now - TWiT, Cranky Geeks, DL.TV, and about half the shows on Revision3.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Amaze Yourself!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gumpo</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 16:45:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This Old Post</title><link>http://leoville.com/2008/04/18/1475/#comment-2620190</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I didn't watch Techtv from the begining, but I did start watching it fairly early, I can remember when we moved it would be the first channel I would make sure we got..   However, as time went on I started watching less and less programs, by the time it went off the air, I remember thinking It was liking watching someone dieing over a long period, I was sad it was going, but I wish it would hurry up and happen&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">klandwehr</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 06:36:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This Old Post</title><link>http://leoville.com/2008/04/18/1475/#comment-2620195</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It reminds me of my previous job at a tech support company. The highlight of the month was when yet another disgruntled employee left the company and sent an informative staff@company.com email to everyone containing a few "home truths"!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Great stuff.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jonathan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 04:58:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This Old Post</title><link>http://leoville.com/2008/04/18/1475/#comment-2620194</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Leo, what thet person wrote could have been allot of companies, that went under during the dot bomb era. I remember comcast asking me to pay more just to get tech TV in Massachusetts. I called them told them I wanted the channel but I was not going to pay any more. I complained allot and they set me up with Tech TV. I know I have comcast for my internet provider heck Verizon stinks but I had to choose the best of the two evils. but Comcast put on this lousy chanel G4. For one thing I don't care for it I rather watch the discovery channel's "Dirty Job's" With Mike Rowe. but the person who commented brought back bad memories of all the people who I knew who jumped for fast bucks and left college for the web sites that were gone as fast as they were started. As for the poor management that happens at allot of companies today. Allot of people running companies have no vision of the future. But as for allot of my firends who were out of work and lost college degrees because they got greedy this person hit everything on the head. The money that banks were giving to non-existant web sites was amazing. As for me who grew up with the electronics boom of the late 70's and 1980's I saw it comming again by 2001. As for me I was working for a newspaper in 2001 and the people who left were losing their houses and cars and begging for their jobs back and not getting them. I am glad you posted your firends old post probally some of the younger people will relize you can't get it fast you have to work for it over time. Also don't be duped by people who say white when you know its black.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 23:33:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This Old Post</title><link>http://leoville.com/2008/04/18/1475/#comment-2620193</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I really miss the TechTV days...I didn't like the all day Tech Live format..it got old really quick...I mean, why pull Leo off of his own show to read news headlines all day and make him stale?? I was glad when they just made tech live a reg. show after TSS...anywho..thanks to Leo and his gang of geeks for keeping things going forward!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marcome</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 18:14:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This Old Post</title><link>http://leoville.com/2008/04/18/1475/#comment-2620192</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I miss my Tech TV, well I actually miss Leo and Screen Savers mostly. I loved the synergy those guys and gals had. Not only did they jive well together......they acutally knew a little something about tech!  I wish a smart, tech oriented (rich mostly) individual would come along and say "Hey Leo, wanna help me buld a TechTV-ish network?" What would ya' say Leo? I'd give you the reins and say have at it, make it good, and I'll just stay back out of your hair and just give you the bucks when you need it. Yeah ,pipe dream-I know.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeff Pierce</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 13:00:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This Old Post</title><link>http://leoville.com/2008/04/18/1475/#comment-2620191</link><description>&lt;p&gt;They should have hired that guy back and made him a consultant.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Phil</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 12:47:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This Old Post</title><link>http://leoville.com/2008/04/18/1475/#comment-2620189</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow.  I suppose the hindsight from those of us on the other side of the TV set is completely different.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I had read and heard passing comments from former TechTV people that things were tough in the last few years, but nothing that ever explained it to this extent.  I suppose that even if the programming had continued, the constant state of poor morale and sense of doom may have bled onto the air.  The thing that scares me most of all is the Audience of One concept.  In comparison, that's why the newer Star Wars movies were nothing in comparison to the old.  Lucas had people telling him "no" in the 70's and 80's.  In the 90's and 2000's, he just had a bunch of  Yes Men under him.  Playing to the interests of one, be it Lucas or Allen, is a horrible idea doomed to fail.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Good luck with TWiT Live, Leo.  If anything, this shows you've been around the block and know what NOT to do.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 11:44:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This Old Post</title><link>http://leoville.com/2008/04/18/1475/#comment-2620188</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Long live tech tv online. &lt;br&gt;I remember watching leo kevin all the gang right after school with my friends.But,now since its all over for television i can now listen/watch leo and friends online. I still have a tech t.v. t shirt from one of the drawings.! I learn a lot from cfh and tss. thank you leo and the rest of tech tv. crew.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;your biggest fan,&lt;br&gt;                           Mark from los angeles ,&lt;br&gt;                                                                    ca&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 11:26:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This Old Post</title><link>http://leoville.com/2008/04/18/1475/#comment-2620187</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Had I read this at the time I might have made the mistake of thinking it was just another articulate flame-out letter.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;With the passage of time (relatively short time) I agree it's prophetic and probably hit the nails on the heads - on several levels.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I had always wondered "what went down" with TechTV and I think I am probably hearing some fairly accurate views on it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;No surprise, either, that Leo and some others were mentioned with respect - and that reinforces some points, too.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;At least we have many of those people (and new ones!) carrying on the next generation of Tech News in the form of blogs, video and audio podcasts. Probably better off, too, being free from compartmentalized management, funding-loyalty restrictions, and arbitrary ratings influences.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Blipfish</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 09:47:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This Old Post</title><link>http://leoville.com/2008/04/18/1475/#comment-2620186</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I was lucky (unlucky?) enough to see almost all of the rise and fall of TechTV and its eventual decline into what it is today (with the exception of X-Play - Go Morgan and Adam). Some of the problems with TechTV covered by the masked stranger go on today in other corporations that are and have been around, unfortunately. I have to give kudo's to Leo as well -&amp;gt; even the most bitter of the bitter still made it a point to call out his obvious abilities several times in his post. I guess my MP3 player's going to have to get upgraded to a video player now that Leo's going video!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Hoffer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 09:26:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This Old Post</title><link>http://leoville.com/2008/04/18/1475/#comment-2620164</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Leo, if you read this or anyone else.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Regarding  nr. 8 above. The interesting thing is that the audience exists today.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Only, through the Internet. Millions of people with fast computers, high resolution screens, and fast Internet connections tied to there computers at workplaces or at home. Or mobile with all kinds of devices.  All hungry for tech content to manage there lives.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;TechTV in all it's incarnations was way ahead of it time trying to market through old media. Like the 1984 machintosh was a decade ahead of the rest of the computer industry.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Claes Krantz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 08:22:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This Old Post</title><link>http://leoville.com/2008/04/18/1475/#comment-2620176</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Where he is? Here maybe: &lt;a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/joshuaagreen" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.linkedin.com/in/joshuaagreen"&gt;http://www.linkedin.com/in/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christian Bech</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 06:40:02 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>